@sspeiche, @jwforres says to ping you on this...

Seems fine to me. I could see someone getting annoyed with it and perhaps wanting to dismiss it.

As far as the wording, I think the wording is fine if the text linked out to somewhere that described what was tech preview. Though I could see 2 different things being tech preview: 1. the UI/UX and 2. the underlying service catalog (and brokers). It might be handy to know when it is one or both.

Seems fine to me. I could see someone getting annoyed with it and perhaps wanting to dismiss it.

Per @jwforres, we sort of want it to be annoying as we will not be supporting service catalog in tech preview and do not want it to be overlooked.

As far as the wording, I think the wording is fine if the text linked out to somewhere that described what was tech preview. Though I could see 2 different things being tech preview: 1. the UI/UX and 2. the underlying service catalog (and brokers). It might be handy to know when it is one or both

Adding a link is easy. What it links to is the hard part. Who is to create the documentation and where does it live?

Gonna go ahead and request review and merge on this with the understanding we'll possibly add a follow on to add a link.

LGTM but don't think this qualifies for a blocker, would rather hold it till monday

[merge]

Evaluated for origin web console merge up to 1c80c6b

Origin Web Console Merge Results: SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_requests_origin_web_console/1584/) (Base Commit: 066938a) (PR Branch Commit: 1c80c6b)